Quick Summary
Bronson undertook a comprehensive review and reconciliation of program funding allocated by IESO to Alectra, an LDC channel partner that chose to participate in the “Pay for Performance” (P4P) financing model.
This process involved an in-depth examination of contracts, cash flows, energy savings, incentive payments, and expenses, along with an assessment of reported totals for the reconciliation process.
The final payment reconciliation included performing IRR calculations on net quarterly cash flows to determine the ultimate balance, accompanied by suggestions for enhancing program design based on identified challenges.
Project Overview
Bronson performed a comprehensive analysis and reconciliation of the funding provided by IESO to Alectra, an LDC channel partner that selected the “Pay for Performance” (P4P) financing model. This reconciliation process involved a thorough examination of contracts, accompanying correspondence, cash flows, net-to-gross energy savings, incentive payments, reported expenses, and a review of the reasonableness and eligibility of the reported figures. Additionally, the final payment reconciliation required intricate IRR calculations on net quarterly cash flows to determine the ultimate balance due in accordance with the P4P funding model’s terms. The final report included recommendations aimed at improving future program design based on the identified challenges.
The Challenge
Ensuring accurate and fair reconciliation of program funding awarded to Alectra through the “Pay for Performance” (P4P) funding model.
Our Solution and Impact
The Bronson team executed a comprehensive review and reconciliation of the program funding. This process included a detailed analysis of contracts, associated documentation, cash flows, energy savings, incentive payments, and expenses, along with an evaluation of the overall accuracy of reported totals. Additionally, the team calculated net quarterly cash flows to determine the final balance due under the “Pay for Performance” funding model. The final report included recommendations aimed at enhancing future program design based on the challenges identified during the review.